Ten billion tokens, fixed at genesis, no mint function afterward. The token exists for one job: to be the bond an attestor puts at risk when they sign a record. Demand comes from needing to hold it in order to earn, not from being paid in it.
| Bucket | Share | Tokens | Release |
|---|---|---|---|
| Network rewards | 28.0% | 2,800,000,000 | Eight year decaying emission. Claimable only by addresses with an active bond, so an idle wallet earns nothing. |
| Team and core contributors | 17.0% | 1,700,000,000 | Four year vest, twelve month cliff, monthly thereafter. |
| Ecosystem treasury | 15.0% | 1,500,000,000 | Four year linear release, governed. Grants, integrations, audits, legal reserve. |
| Investors | 8.0% | 800,000,000 | Twelve month hard lock from token generation, then twenty four month linear. |
| Attestor bootstrap pool | 7.0% | 700,000,000 | Lent as initial bonds to founding attestors and returned to treasury as they capitalize. Not circulating supply. |
| Liquidity and market operations | 6.0% | 600,000,000 | Half at genesis for venue depth, half released over twenty four months. |
| Public sale | 14.0% | 1,400,000,000 | The funding round. Unlocked at generation, sold only under an available exemption. This replaces most of a venture round rather than sitting alongside one. |
| Points conversion | 2.0% | 200,000,000 | Contribution points earned before generation convert here. Unlocked at generation. |
| Advisors and counsel | 3.0% | 300,000,000 | Three year vest, six month cliff. |
| Total | 100.0% | 10,000,000,000 | Fixed at genesis |
The public sale, points conversion, and half the liquidity reserve. Real float on day one rather than a thin one that only looks good on a chart.
Network rewards, treasury, bootstrap pool, public sale and points combined.
Supply cannot be increased. The only supply changes possible are emission from the fixed reward pool and burns.
The curve stops at 93%. The remaining 700 million is the attestor bootstrap pool, lent as collateral and returned to treasury as attestors capitalize themselves. It may never circulate.
Capital locked to sign records. Cannot participate without it, and the amount scales with what you are securing.
Disputing an attestation also requires a bond, so challenges are costly to spam and profitable to get right.
Network fees pay bonded attestors in dollars, never in new tokens. Earning requires holding rather than producing sell pressure.
A share of fee revenue buys tokens on market and burns them. Net supply change is published monthly, including bad months.
Modeled at $0.00179 per token, the figure implied by a $2.5M raise across the 1,400,000,000 token sale allocation. It is a planning assumption, not a price on offer, and no sale is open. Emission follows the published eight year schedule. Burn is funded by revenue only, never by treasury.
A four year vest with a twelve month cliff is a long time to wait, and it is a fair thing to ask about. The answer is that the vest was never meant to be how anyone eats. It is how ownership is earned. Income comes from payroll, funded by the raise and then by revenue.
Core contributors are on payroll from the day the round closes, at market rate for the role and the stage. Investors expect this. A founder taking nothing is a risk to the plan, not a virtue, because a distracted founder is a slower one.
The licensing product starts billing before the token exists. Once recurring revenue covers payroll, compensation steps up against a published band rather than against a vibe, and the treasury stops being the source.
17% of supply sits with the team. That is the wealth event, and it is deliberately illiquid for years so that the people holding it are the people still building. Anyone who wants it faster is telling you something about how long they intend to stay.
Vesting commencement is the date work began, not the date the token generates. Building starts now and generation is a year or more out, so by the time tokens exist a founder who has been here from the start has already served the cliff and vests a meaningful tranche on day one. That is standard practice, it costs the cap table nothing, and it credits the grind that happened before there was anything to grant.
Use of proceeds is a disclosure item, both under Reg D and under Rule 103 of the proposed Startup Exemption. A raise where most of the money becomes founder salary is legal, readable by every investor who asks for the document, and close to unfundable. The discipline is to take a real salary that removes financial stress, and to leave the rest of the round buying engineering, counsel, and audits.
Points for anchoring evidence of use, linking registrations, and completing a chain of title. Free to do, always.
Points for reviewing and countersigning another party's anchor. This is the pre-token version of attestation.
Points for bringing a rights holder onto the network. The supply side gets the upside, which is the whole model.
Points are a record of contribution. They are not a security, not a claim on revenue, not redeemable, not transferable, and carry no promise of future value. Two percent of supply is reserved for conversion if and when a compliant token generation occurs. If it never occurs, points remain what they are, a record of contribution.
| Route | Cap | What it requires | Our position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Startup exemption | $5M / 4 yrs | Form NOR before any offering, narrative disclosures kept current, Form TR at year four. No accredited investor requirement and no resale restrictions. Airdrops and network rewards count as covered transactions. | The intended route once final. 1,400,000,000 tokens is the sale allocation. Any price would be set by the raise target rather than by the cap: a $2.5M target implies $0.00179 per token and a $17.9M fully diluted value. Illustrative only. No terms are set and no sale is open. |
| Tier 1 | $20M / 12 mo | Form 1-CRYPTO offering statement, unaudited financials, ongoing 1-KC and 1-SC reporting. | Only if the network justifies it. Not planned. |
| Tier 2 | $75M / 12 mo | The above plus audited financials. | Out of scope. |
The fundraising exemption carries a US nexus test: US incorporation, a majority of officers and directors in the US, more than half of assets here, and principal business administered here. The last cycle offshored to Cayman and BVI to avoid exactly this regime, and those projects now fail the test. We are a US company and pass it by existing.
The safe harbor relies on issuer self certification, and the SEC can challenge later whether essential managerial efforts genuinely ceased. Final rules may differ from the proposal. The CLARITY Act sits separately in Congress at low odds. We are planning against the proposal as written and will re-plan if it changes.
PRBT is collateral, not a payment method and not a loyalty point. Attestors bond it to sign records, and a false attestation gets that bond slashed. Its only required use is putting capital at risk behind a claim.
Customers never touch it. Rights holders and licensees pay for the licensing product in dollars and settle royalties in USDC. Attestor yield is paid in USDC as well, not in newly emitted tokens.
Ten billion PRBT, fixed. There is no mint function after genesis, so the supply cannot be expanded later by governance or by a team decision. The full allocation is published before any sale rather than after.
Float at token generation is approximately 19 percent of supply. Network rewards emit over eight years on a decaying schedule and are claimable only by addresses with capital at risk, so an idle wallet earns nothing.
Network rewards 28 percent, team and contributors 17 percent, ecosystem treasury 15 percent, public sale 14 percent, investors 8 percent, attestor bootstrap 7 percent, liquidity 6 percent, advisors 3 percent, and contribution points conversion 2 percent.
Team and contributor tokens vest over four years with a twelve month cliff and monthly release thereafter. The largest single bucket is network rewards, which is paid out to participants rather than held by insiders.
There is no launch date. The SEC proposed Regulation Crypto Assets on August 18, 2026, it was published in the Federal Register on August 21, and the comment period is still running, so no United States exemption is final. Probant will file when the rules land, and not before.
In the meantime a contribution points program records who built the registry. Points are not securities, not transferable, and not redeemable. If a compliant distribution happens, points convert. If it does not, points stay a record of contribution and nothing more.
Dollars. Attestor yield is paid in USDC out of fees the network actually collected, not in newly minted tokens. PRBT is what an attestor puts at risk, not what an attestor is paid.
That split is the whole economic argument. A network that pays its supply side in its own inflation is paying with a claim on future buyers. A network that pays in the currency its customers already use is paying out of revenue.